![pearl jam bootlegs website pearl jam bootlegs website](http://www.pjcollectors.com/public/images/officialbootleg/boot_2000_000626_hamburg_front.jpg)
For this and the previous point, see MOS:DISCOG. The tribute albums are also unnecessary, since Pearl Jam aren't the one's that made them.In tables like this, we're only concerned with original, previously-unreleased material. In general, it's not necessary to mention these, since they've already been released. tracks have already appeared on other Pearl Jam releases.
![pearl jam bootlegs website pearl jam bootlegs website](https://cdn.dribbble.com/users/592173/screenshots/6881363/thumb-pj-boots.jpg)
Why do all of the miscellaneous tracks have a bullet point to their left?.I see that most of the certifications have on them, which is good, but not some of the singles.Lastly, I think it's only necessary to wikilnk certifications in the first table. Also, the first time a country is mentioned in the certification column(s), wikilink it to the certifying body ( RIAA, BPI, etc), or if the certifying body doesn't have a page, then the country. Mainly I think it would work better if country abbreviations come before the actual certification rather then after, to avoid parentheses. I'd like to see the certifications re-arranged slightly.Drewcifer ( talk) 09:57, 11 June 2008 (UTC) Ĭomments Looks really really good! I only have a couple minor suggestions: Is it alright to list the total number of live albums including the official bootlegs in the template or should just the major Live albums be counted there (ie, 6)? indopug ( talk) 14:11, 6 June 2008 (UTC).Should Tribute albums be included in a band's discography (since its technically not by the band)?.I just have two questions for the reviewers as I'm unclear what MOS:DISCOG has to say about them: This is great work by -5-, just like his effort with all Pearl Jam-related articles. Support I copy-edited the lead and cleaned up anything I could find a while back. "9.5 million + (US)" – What's the + for? "More than 9.5 million?" Just put 9.5 million since that would be the maximum that has been verified this goes for all of them.If there are any issues I will make sure to address them. A lot of work has gone in to the article and I believe it to be complete and well-referenced. I am nominating the discography because I believe it meets the criteria to be a Featured List. The list was promoted by User:Scorpion0422 20:34, 19 June 2008. No further edits should be made to this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination.